I looked at this today as I wanted to send on arXiv my first typst-authored papers (I have a dozen or so LaTeX papers there). Here is my current understanding of the topic:
-
arxiv does accept PDF-only submissions (to work with people using Word for authoring), which I was previously not aware of! My understanding is that moderators handle these manually and first check why no source is available, so it is not guaranteed that they are processed as promptly as usual submissions. I sent my Typst submission as a PDF-only submission this morning and will let you know how it goes. I think that it is important for the Typst community to use this approach (when they have actual scientific preprints, of course) and make it clear that it is a Typst-authored papers, so that arXiv gets a clear signal that there is a community demand for a more integrated process.
-
the reply Has Typst had a discussion with the arXiv maintainers? - #9 by hpcfzl above is the best public answer to this question (of contact between Typst and arXiv people). This is a talk from a senior software engineer at arXiv (Norbert Preining, also a former computer science academic and a texlive maintainer), who say that they are well aware of Typst and several people on the arXiv team are typst&rust enthusiasts. This is very promising (infinitely more than the previous reddit discussion), as it shows that the two groups are aware of each other.
For me as a researcher it would be important to be able to publish on arXiv, which is an important way to publicize one’s work in my community, and is also used as a storage/archival backend by some open-access journals (“arXiv overlays”): it is likely that at some point the technical possibility of supporting Typst papers on arXiv is going to influence the possibility for me of using Typst professionally. For the time being I am going to explore how much of this question is solved by the PDF-only pipeline (I suspect: not all of it, because the extra friction is going to cause issues), but I think it would be important to discuss better integration.
The questions that the arXiv team are asking about the long-term archival of Typst documents, not just their rendered output, and continued ability to re-render them, are important I think not just for arXiv. (I am moderately surprised that there is not a somewhat-simple question based on Docker images with a fixed operating system and a fixed Typst release, plus possibly a script to automatically download the package dependencies of a document and build a local, minimalist package-repository of exactly those packages.)