I submitted some drafts at some point, but the topic was rejected because the topic was not notable enough, meaning the number of secondary sources was not high enough.
See Notability
You can still find the Draft here, but it might be deleted at some point (can be recovered) if no edits are made.
Some good sources if that helps (they are already in the draft):
- Lisse, Eberhard W. (2023-07-14). “Introduction to Typst”. TUGboat . 44 (2): 315–316. doi:10.47397/tb/44-2/tb137abstracts. ISSN 0896-3207.
- Chandra, Sarat; Sharma, Karan (2024-02-14). “1.5+ million PDFs in 25 minutes”. Zerodha Tech Blog . Retrieved 2024-12-02.c
- Pardue, David (November 2024). “Exploring Typst: A LaTeX Alternative”. The PCLinuxOS Magazine (214): 8.
I agree with @antstei, publishing to JOSS might help, but I think Typst just needs to mature and release a major version 
. Interest might be high in our (niche) community, but in the public space, it’s relatively small. Unless high-profile journals start accepting Typst sources and that spreads, the topic is “not notable enough”.