There’s lots of options. Apologies, I don’t know who developed it, but the citations would be quite significant and it’s a useful “marketing” mechanism.
I submitted some drafts at some point, but the topic was rejected because the topic was not notable enough, meaning the number of secondary sources was not high enough.
I agree with @antstei, publishing to JOSS might help, but I think Typst just needs to mature and release a major version . Interest might be high in our (niche) community, but in the public space, it’s relatively small. Unless high-profile journals start accepting Typst sources and that spreads, the topic is “not notable enough”.
This article is rather old (2023) and behind a paywall so I cannot access it entirely, and it’s in German, but at least it’s the “real” press (whatever that means) and I did not find it above, so here it is: Golem.de: IT-News für Profis.
Great, thank you. That article is in fact available in full on https://archive.fo/ (I’m not sure if I should direct link, that archive site is often flagged as spam?).
It’s like just a short notice level article, quite brief, if we look at just the Typst part.
Given that the article got rejected again based on lacking notability, I thought you might want to add the GitHub blog post about being the 2nd fastest growing major language on the platform in the history section.
Oh…well, I guess it wasn’t much of a surprise for the regulars on the forum. (For some reason notifications were set to “Tracking” instead of “Watching” and I missed a whole bunch of things here.)