Hello everyone! I’ve been using typst for quite a while now, and there is always this one thing that i can’t do thats bugging me. In latex there is a package called witharrows that lets you write equations and have arrows explainging what i did to get from the first equation to the seconed, but in…

Here is an implementation in typst. It uses the smart querying that I learned/came up with after discussion in issue #2425. It uses two functions, mimicing the original, witharrows() and explain() [rendered result of the below] /// A "with arrows" environment /// Adding arrows with explanations …

Hi @Michael_Ronin , Would something like pinit – Typst Universe do the trick for you? Or else… Search — Typst: Universe

I have tried to use pinit but i just couldn’t get it to do what i needed. It will be really helpful if you’ll create the provided example with it so that i could see how to use it. Thanks for the reply :grinning:

Here is a semi-automated version using mannot : #import "@preview/mannot:0.3.0": annot-cetz, mark #import "@preview/cetz:0.4.1" #let bent-arrow(from, to, body, bend: 0.1, shrink: 0.04) = { import cetz.draw: arc-through, content, set-style let mid = (rel: (bend, 0), to: (from, 50%, to)) set-st…

Wow! You two are really good with typst… I have no idea whats going on with the code but it works so thank you very much, I really appreciate it.

You can read the mannot docs. Should explain most of it. The rest is just layers of abstractions to make it more concise and readable. The main issue is that Typst doesn’t have native arrows, and cetz doesn’t have the customization of marks and lines like fletcher does. But mannot is only integrated…

I have updated and bugfixed my example. Out of pure stubbornness (maybe) I drew the arrows in pure typst, because it’s not easy to do natively with mannot, and inserting a cetz diagram on top is also not straightforward. The example also has a home until further notice at witharrow · main · bluss /…

That is really nice, but i have a follow up question. When i try to use a template with this code (both your original one and the new one) suddenly all of the things inside the explain function disappear and i’m left only with the arrows. do you know how to fix it?

The template is incompatible then, for some reason. Maybe this witharrows function is incompatible with equate for example, I haven’t tried it. It would be best if you could share some short code that reproduces the problem.

hmmm, seems like it happens because my language is set to an rtl language (and my template was in rtl), any idea why this would matter?

Don’t know actually. The equations still look the same way, the equations are LTR, or how do you do it?

Typst Forum

How to add arrows between equation lines, like latex `witharrows`, in Typst?

Questions

math

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled